“Concerning the Justice of God in the Punishment of the Sinner”

Bryan Richards

As an introduction to chapter 42, we should remember the words of Joseph Smith, “I have a key by which I understand the scriptures. I enquire, what was the question which drew out the answer?” (Teachings, p. 276) The question which drew out Alma‘s answer was Corianton’s concern that it is unfair for God to punish sinners.

This provides an interesting character study on young Corianton. The sinner, especially the sinner who has been taught the truth from his childhood, always has to develop some rationalization to deal with the internal conflict which results from knowing right and choosing wrong. Corianton’s version of this is common—to question God’s fairness in the punishment of the sinner. This argument appeals to the “life is not fair” mentality. It is designed as an excuse, which Alma recognizes, Do not endeavor to excuse yourself in the least point because of your sins (v. 30). The Corianton doctrine was also taught by Nephi, there shall also be many which shall say: Eat, drink, and be merry; nevertheless, fear God—he will justify in committing a little sin…and if it so be that we are guilty, God will beat us with a few stripes, and at last we shall be saved in the kingdom of God (2 Nephi 28:8). After leaving his mission and committing adultery with a harlot, Corianton rationalized that he was worthy of a few stripes, not the eternal consignation to a state of misery.

GospelDoctrine.Com

References